A carregar...
Publicação
Practical argumentation as reasoned advocacy
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 580.96 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
The paper offers a theo retical investigation into the sources of normativity in practical argumen tation. The chief question is: Do we need objectively-minded, unbiased arguers or can we count on "good" argumentative processes in which individual biases cancel each other out? I address this question by ana lysing a detailed structure of practi cal argument and its varieties, and by discussing the tenets of a com parative approach to practical rea son. I argue that given the compara tive structure proposed, reasoned advocacy in argumentative activity upholds reasonableness whenever that activity is adequately designed. I propose some basic rules for such a design of practical argumentation.
Descrição
UID/FIL/00183/2013
Palavras-chave
Advocacy Argumentation Comparativism Deliberation Polylogue Practical argument Philosophy