Publicação
Practical argumentation as reasoned advocacy
| dc.contributor.author | Lewinski, Marcin | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA) | |
| dc.contributor.pbl | University of Windsor | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-27T23:08:31Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-02-27T23:08:31Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.description | UID/FIL/00183/2013 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The paper offers a theo retical investigation into the sources of normativity in practical argumen tation. The chief question is: Do we need objectively-minded, unbiased arguers or can we count on "good" argumentative processes in which individual biases cancel each other out? I address this question by ana lysing a detailed structure of practi cal argument and its varieties, and by discussing the tenets of a com parative approach to practical rea son. I argue that given the compara tive structure proposed, reasoned advocacy in argumentative activity upholds reasonableness whenever that activity is adequately designed. I propose some basic rules for such a design of practical argumentation. | en |
| dc.description.version | publishersversion | |
| dc.description.version | published | |
| dc.format.extent | 29 | |
| dc.format.extent | 594900 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.22329/il.v37i2.4775 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0824-2577 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE: 3197382 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: f1b0c5af-d8fb-47df-aa5a-0f1308d3aa54 | |
| dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 85020393032 | |
| dc.identifier.other | WOS: 000404357600001 | |
| dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-7218-3948/work/55089632 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020393032&partnerID=8YFLogxK | |
| dc.identifier.url | https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85020393032 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | |
| dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147240/PT | |
| dc.subject | Advocacy | |
| dc.subject | Argumentation | |
| dc.subject | Comparativism | |
| dc.subject | Deliberation | |
| dc.subject | Polylogue | |
| dc.subject | Practical argument | |
| dc.subject | Philosophy | |
| dc.title | Practical argumentation as reasoned advocacy | en |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| degois.publication.firstPage | 85 | |
| degois.publication.issue | 2 | |
| degois.publication.lastPage | 113 | |
| degois.publication.title | Informal Logic | |
| degois.publication.volume | 37 | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.awardNumber | UID/FIL/00183/2013 | |
| oaire.awardURI | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/UID%2FFIL%2F00183%2F2013/PT | |
| oaire.fundingStream | 5876 | |
| project.funder.identifier | http://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871 | |
| project.funder.name | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia | |
| rcaap.rights | openAccess | |
| relation.isProjectOfPublication | 7ec02e50-15a3-4e73-b344-13276417bf1f | |
| relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 7ec02e50-15a3-4e73-b344-13276417bf1f |
Ficheiros
Principais
1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
- Nome:
- 4775_13068_1_PB_1_.pdf
- Tamanho:
- 580.96 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format