A carregar...
Publicação
Sentido e sem-sentido: Deleuze e Wittgenstein
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 549.76 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
A dissertação gira em torno da questão do “sentido” em Deleuze (sens) e Wittgenstein
(Sinn), autores com uma distinta forma de fazer filosofia, representando vulgarmente duas
distintas tradições filosóficas – a filosofia continental e a filosofia analítica,
respetivamente. O que se pretende sobretudo é analisar as diferenças existentes entre as
suas conceções de linguagem, procurando ao mesmo tempo aspetos comuns entre elas, e
de forma indireta aludir a uma aproximação, tanto quanto possível, das duas tradições da
filosofia e das suas metodologias. O corpo principal da dissertação incide sobre a análise
que Deleuze realiza na Lógica do Sentido da linguagem esquizofrénica, sobretudo a de
Antonin Artaud, e também sobre a aplicação que autores como Louis Sass fizeram da
ideia de solipsismo em Wittgenstein a casos de esquizofrenia como o de Daniel Paul
Schreber. A partir do sentido da linguagem da esquizofrenia, estuda-se um possível
paralelo entre os pensamentos de Deleuze e Wittgenstein. Conclui-se que não só o estudo
sobre sentido e sem-sentido quando considerado em oposição é limitado, mas também
que, ao contrário daquilo que é habitualmente defendido, o pensamento destes dois
autores não é incompatível.
The thesis revolves around the question of “sense” in Deleuze (sens) and Wittgenstein (Sinn), authors with a distinct way of doing philosophy, commonly representing two distinct philosophical traditions – continental philosophy and analytical philosophy, respectively. The main aim is to analyse the differences between their conceptions of language, looking at the same time for common aspects between them, and indirectly alluding to an approximation, as much as possible, of the two traditions of philosophy and their methodologies. The main body of the dissertation focuses on the analysis that Deleuze carries out in the Logic of Sense of schizophrenic language, especially that of Antonin Artaud, and on the application that authors such as Louis Sass made of Wittgenstein’s idea of solipsism to cases of schizophrenia like that of Daniel Paul Schreber. Based on the sense of the language of schizophrenia, we study a possible parallel between the thoughts of Deleuze and Wittgenstein. We conclude that not only the study of sense and nonsense when considered in opposition is limited, but also that, contrary to what is usually defended, the thinking of these two authors is not incompatible.
The thesis revolves around the question of “sense” in Deleuze (sens) and Wittgenstein (Sinn), authors with a distinct way of doing philosophy, commonly representing two distinct philosophical traditions – continental philosophy and analytical philosophy, respectively. The main aim is to analyse the differences between their conceptions of language, looking at the same time for common aspects between them, and indirectly alluding to an approximation, as much as possible, of the two traditions of philosophy and their methodologies. The main body of the dissertation focuses on the analysis that Deleuze carries out in the Logic of Sense of schizophrenic language, especially that of Antonin Artaud, and on the application that authors such as Louis Sass made of Wittgenstein’s idea of solipsism to cases of schizophrenia like that of Daniel Paul Schreber. Based on the sense of the language of schizophrenia, we study a possible parallel between the thoughts of Deleuze and Wittgenstein. We conclude that not only the study of sense and nonsense when considered in opposition is limited, but also that, contrary to what is usually defended, the thinking of these two authors is not incompatible.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Deleuze Esquizofrenia Sentido/sem-sentido Wittgenstein Sense/nonsense Schizophrenia