Publicação
What's in a good argument about evaluative claims?
| dc.contributor.author | Mohammed, Dima | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-15T19:47:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-15T19:47:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.description | SFRH/BPD/76149/2011 UID/FIL/00183/2013 | |
| dc.description.abstract | What counts as a good defence of the conduct of a political agent? I formulate an answer combining insightsfrom argumentation scholarship on the different types of standpoints and the schemes suitable to defend them withinsights from philosophical literature (fact vs. value, theoretical vs. practical reasoning … etc). The goal is to make aproposal that is best suitable for examining the type of evaluative claims that is typically discussed in accountabilitypractices. | en |
| dc.description.version | publishersversion | |
| dc.description.version | published | |
| dc.format.extent | 14 | |
| dc.format.extent | 387437 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2371-8323 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE: 4240206 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: e86af889-c920-4c0c-9464-92758a594654 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/199227 | |
| dc.identifier.url | https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA11/papersandcommentaries/116/ | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | |
| dc.relation | repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147240/PT | |
| dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F76149%2F2011/PT | |
| dc.subject | accountability | |
| dc.subject | argument from sign | |
| dc.subject | conductive argument | |
| dc.subject | evaluative claim | |
| dc.subject | evaluative adjectives | |
| dc.subject | factvalue distinction | |
| dc.subject | symptomatic argument | |
| dc.subject | type of standpoint | |
| dc.title | What's in a good argument about evaluative claims? | en |
| dc.title.subtitle | Argumentation in accountability practices | en |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| degois.publication.firstPage | 1 | |
| degois.publication.lastPage | 14 | |
| degois.publication.title | Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference | |
| degois.publication.volume | 11 | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| rcaap.rights | openAccess |
Ficheiros
Principais
1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
- Nome:
- Whats_in_a_good_argument_about_evaluative_claims_Argumentation.pdf
- Tamanho:
- 378.36 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format