A carregar...
Publicação
What's in a good argument about evaluative claims?
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 378.36 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
What counts as a good defence of the conduct of a political agent? I formulate an answer combining insightsfrom argumentation scholarship on the different types of standpoints and the schemes suitable to defend them withinsights from philosophical literature (fact vs. value, theoretical vs. practical reasoning … etc). The goal is to make aproposal that is best suitable for examining the type of evaluative claims that is typically discussed in accountabilitypractices.
Descrição
SFRH/BPD/76149/2011
UID/FIL/00183/2013
Palavras-chave
accountability argument from sign conductive argument evaluative claim evaluative adjectives factvalue distinction symptomatic argument type of standpoint