| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
The controversy around the Anti-#MeToo Manifesto is undoubtedly a reflection of ‘a central rift within feminism’ today. Nevertheless, a closer look reveals that the divide has also been deepened by a series of clumsy discursive choices and misunderstandings. This paper offers an argumentative analysis that highlights the controversy’s unfortunate turns, sheds light on the divide, and shows how important and yet how arduous a task it is to manage the argumentative potential of one’s discursive choices in today’s networked public sphere.
Descrição
UID/FIL/00183/2019
DL 57/2016/CP1453/CT0049
Palavras-chave
Agency argument Argumentative associate Disagreement network Feminism #MeToo Rape apology Standing standpoin Networked public sphere SDG 5 - Gender Equality
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Editora
Sic Sat: International Center for the Study of Argumentation
