| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.05 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Understanding the full concepts of modelling techniques is what organizations lack these
days which sometimes affects their decision in terms of choosing the tools to model and
implement their processes. This, however, is a challenge as organisations tend to choose
tools based on current trend or what their competitors used to achieve profit. Other
researchers have done similar analysis comparing multiple modelling languages to identify
the strength and weakness of each of the languages and to enlighten the users.
This study analysed both BPMN2.0 and IDEF (IDEF0 and IDEF3) and built a comparative
matrix showing the strengths and weakness of each technique. Design Science Research
(DSR) was used for the methodology that involved carrying out surveys and drafting
questionnaires. The results gotten from the survey was used to validate the matrix thereby
suggesting recommendations with the hope of being useful to both academia and
professionals. In doing so first, there was the need to establish an understanding of each tool
which incorporates the framework and breakdown structure.
Descrição
Dissertation presented as the partial requirement for obtaining a Master's degree in Information Management, specialization in Information Systems and Technologies Management
Palavras-chave
Business Process Management BPMN IDEF0 IDEF3 Modelling Techniques
