A carregar...
Publicação
Anapus gamtos ir kultūros?
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.52 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
In this paper, we will analyze how anthropological thinking, in the last twenty years, has put the conceptual categories of Culture and Nature into radical questioning. Nature was “denaturalized” and deemed as a social construction that was specific to the history of Western world. But to avoid the alternative between nature and culture one should develop a “non-dualist” approach and, in this sense, we will then consider Tim Ingold’s works. According to the British anthropologist, the nature and culture divide is usually the outcome of an assumption recurrent in anthropology, that according to which our cultural frames determine our perception of outside world. For Ingold, phenomenological thinking reversed the ontological priorities of Western rationalism.
Descrição
Copyright (c) 2013 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
Palavras-chave
Constructionism Culture Ingold Nature Phenomenology Cultural Studies Sociology and Political Science Political Science and International Relations