Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Discrimination Bans and Insurance Law

dc.contributor.authorRego, Margarida Lima
dc.contributor.authorRego, Margarida Lima
dc.contributor.institutionNOVA School of Law|Faculdade de Direito (NSL|FD)
dc.contributor.institutionCentro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento sobre Direito e Sociedade (CEDIS)
dc.coverage.spatialCham
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-19T21:03:38Z
dc.date.available2025-02-19T21:03:38Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractInsurers rely on data and statistics to assess the risk they take on from their customers. Their evaluation of these risks provides a scientific basis for their pricing decisions. Whilst statistical discrimination as such has been clearly identified and widely studied and discussed in scientific writings in economics at least since the 1970s, for a long time these discourses scarcely penetrated the insurance business. Insurers characteristically rely on the findings of actuarial science to assess and put a price on each risk that they cover. Their decisions purport to be based on solid statistical data. Therefore, it was assumed that insurance would remain safely within legal boundaries. In this chapter, I address the conflict between two seemingly different egalitarian accounts of distributive justice that the use of some actuarial factors by insurers appears to summon. I distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable uses of sex as an actuarial factor, making the case for a moderate version of the unisex rule. I contrast the treatment of sex as an actuarial factor in Europe with the prospects of other common actuarial factors, such as age and disability. I also analyse the impact of big data on discrimination bans and address the growing difficulties of combating direct and especially indirect discrimination in a world where tech-based decision-making tools resort to virtually unchecked self-learning algorithms that explore a multitude of factual correlations previously undetectable by humankind.en
dc.description.versionauthorsversion
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.extent24
dc.format.extent559691
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-82704-5_1
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-030-82703-8
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-030-82706-9
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-030-82704-5
dc.identifier.issn2662-1770
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 48396826
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 3cad9048-6274-44ae-87a6-8326afd7f882
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85143426306
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-9293-8503/work/179857539
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/179346
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85143426306
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.subjectLaw
dc.titleDiscrimination Bans and Insurance Lawen
dc.typebook part
degois.publication.firstPage3
degois.publication.issue1st
degois.publication.lastPage26
degois.publication.titleInsurance and Human Rights
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.familyNameLima Rego
person.givenNameMargarida
person.identifier.ciencia-id8C19-623D-D304
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9293-8503
rcaap.rightsopenAccess
relation.isAuthorOfPublication88b16a17-2e2a-43be-88a3-143f73dbc280
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery88b16a17-2e2a-43be-88a3-143f73dbc280

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
MLR_2021_Post-Print_Discrimination_Bans_and_Insurance.pdf
Tamanho:
546.57 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format