Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

A means-end classification of argumentation schemes

dc.contributor.authorMacagno, Fabrizio
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA)
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-15T19:55:10Z
dc.date.available2026-01-15T19:55:10Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.descriptionUID/FIL/00183/2013
dc.description.abstractOne of the crucial problems of argumentation schemes as illustrated in (Walton, Reed & Macagno, 2008) is their practical use for the purpose of analyzing texts and producing arguments. For this purpose, argumentation schemes will be analyzed as prototypical combinations between two distinct levels of abstraction, i.e. semantic (or material) relations and types of reasoning. These two levels can justify an end-means criterion of classification, representing the intended purpose of an argument and the means to achieve it. This criterion is strictly bound to the pragmatic purpose of an argumentative move and the ontological (semantic) structure of the conclusion and the premises.en
dc.description.versionpublishersversion
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.extent313260
dc.identifier.issn2212-425X
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 5480991
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 9b91271a-3eab-4e9b-9ba4-80a4e1b4614b
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/199237
dc.identifier.urlhttp://rozenbergquarterly.com/issa-proceedings-2014-a-means-end-classification-of-argumentation-schemes/
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147240/PT
dc.subjectAbstraction
dc.subjectArgument
dc.subjectArgumentation schemes
dc.subjectClassification,
dc.subjectSemantic relations
dc.subjectTypes of reasoning
dc.titleA means-end classification of argumentation schemesen
dc.typejournal article
degois.publication.titleRozenberg Quarterly
dspace.entity.typePublication
rcaap.rightsopenAccess

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
Macagno_meansEndProceedings.pdf
Tamanho:
305.92 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format