| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 657.84 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Several philosophers argue for the ‘convergence thesis’ for positional goods: prioritarians, sufcientarians, and egalitarians may converge on favouring an equal (or not too unequal) distribution of goods that have positional aspects. I discuss some problems for this thesis when applied to two key goods for which it has been proposed: education and wealth. I show, however, that there is a variant of the thesis that avoids these problems. This version of the thesis is signifcant, I demonstrate, because it applies to a person’s status as a citizen, which I suggest is the central concern of social or ‘relational’ egalitarianism.
Descrição
PTDC/FER-FIL/6088/2020
UIDB/00183/2020
UIDP/00183/2020
Palavras-chave
Positional goods Social equality Relational equality Priority Sufciency Levelling down
