Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Challenging Authority with Argumentation

dc.contributor.authorLewiński, Marcin
dc.contributor.institutionDepartamento de Ciências da Comunicação (DCC)
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA)
dc.contributor.pblMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-09T22:27:37Z
dc.date.available2023-03-09T22:27:37Z
dc.date.issued2022-09
dc.descriptionUIDB/00183/2020 UIDP/00183/2020
dc.description.abstractAuthority is both a pragmatic condition of much public discourse and a form of argumentative appeal routinely used in it. The goal of this contribution is to propose a new account of challenging authority in argumentative discourse that benefits from the interplay of the resources of recent speech act theory and argumentation theory. Going beyond standard approaches of the two disciplines, the paper analyzes nuanced forms of establishing and, especially, challenging discourse-related authority. Can Donald Trump advise his own scientific advisors on potential COVID-19 treatments? Addressing questions like this, the paper identifies various paradoxes of authority and the forms of authority discussed in the literature. It then distinguishes between argument from authority (or expert opinion) and argument to authority (or expert opinion) and argues that this rearranged structure mutually benefits the pragmatic account of speech act theory and the schematic account of argumentation theory in the task of better understanding and critiquing discourses such as Trump’s.en
dc.description.versionpublishersversion
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.extent18
dc.format.extent956207
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/languages7030207
dc.identifier.issn2226-471X
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 55072386
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 11d61f31-28bd-4cff-8871-46264d439c0b
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85138731156
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7218-3948/work/130536620
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000857713300001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/150281
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85138731156
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/7/3/207
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00183%2F2020/PT
dc.relationNOVA Institute of Philosophy
dc.relationNOVA Institute of Philosophy
dc.subjectAdvice
dc.subjectArgument from expert opinion
dc.subjectArgumentum ad verecundiam
dc.subjectAuthority
dc.subjectExpertise
dc.subjectIllocution
dc.subjectSpeech act theory
dc.subjectLanguage and Linguistics
dc.subjectLinguistics and Language
dc.titleChallenging Authority with Argumentationen
dc.title.subtitleThe Pragmatics of Arguments from and to Authorityen
dc.typejournal article
degois.publication.firstPage1
degois.publication.issue3
degois.publication.lastPage18
degois.publication.titleLanguages
degois.publication.volume7
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardNumberUIDB/00183/2020
oaire.awardNumberUIDP/00183/2020
oaire.awardTitleNOVA Institute of Philosophy
oaire.awardTitleNOVA Institute of Philosophy
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00183%2F2020/PT
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F00183%2F2020/PT
oaire.fundingStream6817 - DCRRNI ID
oaire.fundingStream6817 - DCRRNI ID
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
rcaap.rightsopenAccess
relation.isProjectOfPublication78283463-286e-42d7-8f32-b489e2ef4ae5
relation.isProjectOfPublication2a933043-2d71-42dd-af01-ec8e159e1912
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscovery78283463-286e-42d7-8f32-b489e2ef4ae5

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
languages_07_00207.pdf
Tamanho:
933.8 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format