Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Lidar com a incerteza

2024-06-19Artigo científico Acesso aberto
Ver registo simples
dc.contributor.authorRossi, Maria Grazia
dc.contributor.authorMohammed, Dima
dc.contributor.authorBigi, Sarah
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA)
dc.contributor.pblUniversidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (UNED)
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-14T14:49:55Z
dc.date.available2026-01-14T14:49:55Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-19
dc.descriptionUIDB/00183/2020 UIDP/00183/2020
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we explore a particular normative dimension of the strategies used by healthcare professionals to manage uncertainty in medical consultations. We analyze medical consultations focusing on the argumentative potential of doubts expressed by patients and their families by examining the inferences activated beyond what is explicitly stated in the sequences exhibiting doubt. Using the distinction between three argumentative potentials of doubt (ambivalent doubt, skeptic doubt, and denialism), we run an exploratory analysis on an Italian corpus of 52 medical consultations between health professionals and patients with Type 2 diabetes. Based on the analysis, we argue that when expressed in medical consultations, skeptical doubts should be explicitly acknowledged and adequately addressed to prevent the doubt from acquiring a denialist potential, which can undermine patient adherence and the possibility of favorable health outcomes.en
dc.description.versionpublishersversion
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.extent14
dc.format.extent358898
dc.identifier.doi10.15366/ria2024.m2.003
dc.identifier.issn2172-8801
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 113783594
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: e40a71d0-9c21-4b21-b855-8e4ce3714b62
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85197467546
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/198911
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85197467546
dc.identifier.urlhttps://revistas.uam.es/ria/article/view/19439#authorInfoCollapse
dc.language.isopor
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00183%2F2020/PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F00183%2F2020/PT
dc.subjectArgumentative potential
dc.subjectDoubts
dc.subjectHealth controversies
dc.subjectMedical argumentation
dc.subjectMedical communication
dc.subjectMedical uncertainty
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.subjectLinguistics and Language
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
dc.titleLidar com a incertezapt
dc.title.subtitleo potencial argumentativo da dúvida nas consultas médicaspt
dc.typejournal article
degois.publication.firstPage35
degois.publication.issue2
degois.publication.lastPage48
degois.publication.titleRevista Iberoamericana de Argumentacion
dspace.entity.typePublication
rcaap.rightsopenAccess

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nome:
66136.pdf
Tamanho:
350.49 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Ver/Abrir

Coleções

Home collection (FCSH)