A carregar...
Publicação
O romance da obra: Paradoxo e João Guimarães Rosa
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.41 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Esta tese propõe uma leitura romanesca da obra de João Guimarães Rosa. Como se justifica essa proposta? Alegando que obra e autoria são criações fabulosas e que há por isso interesse em estudar as tramitações da criação, suas aventuras e peripécias? Constatando que são noções correlativas, no sentido em que não há autoria sem obra e não há obra sem autoria? Sublinhando a universalidade segundo a qual autoria e obra transcendem a soma das partes que as formam? Porquê ler um romance na obra de João Guimarães Rosa? Porque o exemplo é um caminho sólido para a abstração, porque a obra de Rosa é particularmente exemplar quanto à sua vocação universal e, acima de tudo, porque a ideia de obra permeia os artefactos que a compõem, mostrando que os livros se organizam, com a história que contam e a ideia de literatura que transmitem, de acordo com um projeto de conjunto que antecipa o próprio conjunto e faz da autoria mitografia. Como ler na obra de João Guimarães Rosa um romance? Procurando no paradoxo um fio condutor para o estudo da sua construção e um instrumento de leitura, obtém-se uma peculiar espécie de não-senso, noção operativa que conjuga reflexividade e ironia enquanto marcas literárias da antinomia. O percurso da autoria será analisado à luz do paradoxo em que ora se aglomeram vida e obra, ora se cindem duas biografias, uma temporal e outra literária. Com a reconstituição da biografia literária, em torno de uma metanoia, levanta-se o problema da assinatura. Veremos como a chancela autoral acarreta uma certa ideia de legitimidade, a que corresponde, com o fito de construir uma obra orgânica, viva a ponto de assegurar a própria transmissão, a deliberação de um cânone.
This thesis proposes a novelistic reading of João Guimarães Rosa's work. How might this proposal be justified? By claiming work and authorship are fabulous creations and that there is therefore interest in studying the transactions of creation, its adventures and unfoldings? By noting these are correlative notions, in the sense that there is no authorship without work and no work without authorship? By emphasizing the universality according to which authorship and work transcend the sum of their constituent parts? Why read a novel in the work of João Guimarães Rosa? Because the example provides a solid path to abstraction, because Rosa's work is particularly exemplary in its universal vocation, and above all because the idea of work permeates its artifacts, showing that books are organized, with the story they tell and the idea of literature they convey, according to an overarching project that anticipates the whole itself and renders authorship into mythography. How to read a novel in the work of João Guimarães Rosa? By seeking in paradox a guiding thread for the study of its construction and an instrument of reading, one obtains a peculiar kind of nonsense, an operative notion that combines reflexivity and irony as literary marks of antinomy. The trajectory of authorship will be analyzed through the paradox in which life and work are simultaneously merged and split into two biographies, one temporal and the other literary. The reconstitution of the literary biography, structured around a metanoia, raises the problem of signature. We will see how the authorial seal carries a certain idea of legitimacy — one that, in its aim to construct an organic work, so alive as to ensure its own transmission, entails the deliberation of a canon.
This thesis proposes a novelistic reading of João Guimarães Rosa's work. How might this proposal be justified? By claiming work and authorship are fabulous creations and that there is therefore interest in studying the transactions of creation, its adventures and unfoldings? By noting these are correlative notions, in the sense that there is no authorship without work and no work without authorship? By emphasizing the universality according to which authorship and work transcend the sum of their constituent parts? Why read a novel in the work of João Guimarães Rosa? Because the example provides a solid path to abstraction, because Rosa's work is particularly exemplary in its universal vocation, and above all because the idea of work permeates its artifacts, showing that books are organized, with the story they tell and the idea of literature they convey, according to an overarching project that anticipates the whole itself and renders authorship into mythography. How to read a novel in the work of João Guimarães Rosa? By seeking in paradox a guiding thread for the study of its construction and an instrument of reading, one obtains a peculiar kind of nonsense, an operative notion that combines reflexivity and irony as literary marks of antinomy. The trajectory of authorship will be analyzed through the paradox in which life and work are simultaneously merged and split into two biographies, one temporal and the other literary. The reconstitution of the literary biography, structured around a metanoia, raises the problem of signature. We will see how the authorial seal carries a certain idea of legitimacy — one that, in its aim to construct an organic work, so alive as to ensure its own transmission, entails the deliberation of a canon.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Obra Autoria Paradoxo Ironia Reflexidade Work Authorship Paradox Irony Reflexity