Publicação
From Explanation to Action
| dc.contributor.author | Porfírio, Rui Pedro | |
| dc.contributor.author | Santos, Pedro Albuquerque | |
| dc.contributor.author | Madeira, Rui Neves | |
| dc.contributor.institution | NOVALincs | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-09T10:19:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-09T10:19:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-04-13 | |
| dc.description | Publisher Copyright: © 2026 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). | |
| dc.description.abstract | Agronomists bear the responsibility of verifying AI predictions to ensure safe agricultural decision-making. However, a critical gap persists in understanding how these domain experts leverage Explainable AI (XAI) to verify diagnoses within their workflows. We conducted a qualitative case study with nine professional agronomists to evaluate feature-attribution and example-based explanations. Our observations suggest that abstract heatmaps risk reinforcing automation bias by obscuring the biological ground truth. In contrast, example-based explanations appeared to support the experts' epistemic practice of situated seeing. Furthermore, participants consistently prioritized actionability over transparency. They viewed the diagnosis not as an endpoint, but as a prerequisite for intervention. Consequently, this work contributes design considerations to bridge the gap between static model explanations and active agronomic scrutiny. | en |
| dc.description.version | publishersversion | |
| dc.description.version | published | |
| dc.format.extent | 5 | |
| dc.format.extent | 555112 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1145/3772363.3799333 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9798400722813 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE: 163664836 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: b279bc71-d31c-48fd-8d06-8f5b4565e9ba | |
| dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 105038086025 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/204400 | |
| dc.identifier.url | https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105038086025 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | |
| dc.publisher | ACM - Association for Computing Machinery | |
| dc.subject | Agronomy | |
| dc.subject | Digital Agriculture | |
| dc.subject | Domain Experts | |
| dc.subject | Explainable AI | |
| dc.subject | Human-centered AI | |
| dc.subject | Qualitative Study | |
| dc.subject | Human-Computer Interaction | |
| dc.subject | Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design | |
| dc.subject | Software | |
| dc.title | From Explanation to Action | en |
| dc.title.subtitle | A Case Study of Agronomist Workflows | en |
| dc.type | conference object | |
| degois.publication.title | CHI EA '26 | |
| degois.publication.title | Extended Abtracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2026 | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| rcaap.rights | openAccess |
Ficheiros
Principais
1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
- Nome:
- Porf_rio_Santos_e_Madeira._2026_..pdf
- Tamanho:
- 542.1 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
