Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

“To work, or not to work, that is the question”

dc.contributor.authorRuhle, S. A.
dc.contributor.authorBreitsohl, H.
dc.contributor.authorAboagye, E.
dc.contributor.authorBaba, V.
dc.contributor.authorBiron, C.
dc.contributor.authorCorreia Leal, C.
dc.contributor.authorDietz, C.
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, A. I.
dc.contributor.authorGerich, J.
dc.contributor.authorJohns, G.
dc.contributor.authorKaranika-Murray, M.
dc.contributor.authorLohaus, D.
dc.contributor.authorLøkke, A.
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Sara L.
dc.contributor.authorMartinez, Luis F.
dc.contributor.authorMiraglia, M.
dc.contributor.authorMuschalla, B.
dc.contributor.authorPoethke, U.
dc.contributor.authorSarwat, N.
dc.contributor.authorSchade, H.
dc.contributor.authorSteidelmüller, C.
dc.contributor.authorVinberg, S.
dc.contributor.authorWhysall, Z.
dc.contributor.authorYang, T.
dc.contributor.institutionNOVA School of Business and Economics (NOVA SBE)
dc.contributor.pblRoutledge
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-24T23:21:44Z
dc.date.available2022-07-22T00:31:20Z
dc.date.embargoedUntil2021-06-03
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description
dc.description.abstractThis position paper brings together recent and emerging developments in the field of presenteeism. A critical synthesis of the evidence is needed due to persisting conceptual and methodological challenges as well as the increased volume of research in the field. This paper integrates emerging evidence and critical thinking into three areas: (1) concept, (2) measurement and methodological issues, and (3) the context of presenteeism. First, due to the variety of existing definitions, competing understandings, as well as the notion of positive presenteeism, it is important to reconsider the notion of presenteeism. Second, it is important to reflect on the measurement of the act of presenteeism and the productivity loss associated with that. Third, following the call to investigate presenteeism in specific contexts, it is important to explain the social, occupational, cross-cultural aspects, as well as the contemporary workplace changes. Based on this critical synthesis, we conclude by identifying recommendations for future research on presenteeism.en
dc.description.versionauthorsversion
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.extent664004
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1359432X.2019.1704734
dc.identifier.issn1359-432X
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 16198052
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 2b40c640-e89d-4072-b85a-05454141db7d
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85076882131
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000503708300001
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9554-5374/work/85243704
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/99903
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85076882131
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.relationFunding agencies
dc.relationAlpen-Adria-Universitat Klagenfurt
dc.relationAustrian Research Association
dc.relationFriends of the Faculty of Management and Economics
dc.relationEuropean Association of Work and Organizational Psychologists (EAWOP)
dc.subjectabsenteeism
dc.subjectcontext
dc.subjectmeasurement
dc.subjectposition paper
dc.subjectPresenteeism
dc.subjectApplied Psychology
dc.subjectOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
dc.title“To work, or not to work, that is the question”en
dc.title.subtitleRecent trends and avenues for research on presenteeismen
dc.typejournal article
degois.publication.firstPage344
degois.publication.issue3
degois.publication.lastPage363
degois.publication.titleEuropean Journal Of Work And Organizational Psychology
degois.publication.volume29
dspace.entity.typePublication
rcaap.rightsopenAccess

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
EWO_2020_manuscript_ruhle_et_al.pdf
Tamanho:
648.44 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format