A carregar...
Publicação
O campo da cultura no tempo de D. Maria I (1777-1792): Intelectuais, sociabilidades e Corte, entre continuidades e ruturas
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.83 MB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Numa reflexão sobre a sociedade portuguesa no período do governo efetivo da
rainha D. Maria I, entre 1777 e 1792, e as suas representações, parece-nos faltar uma
perceção mais detalhada sobre a relação entre os autores e os recetores da produção de cultura, bem como sobre os espaços em que ela se legitima. Com esta investigação, pretendemos questionar de que forma a articulação entre os espaços, quer públicos quer privados, e os autores e os recetores da produção de cultura permite relacionar as ideias com as práticas de cultura, apresentando-se uma
visão relacional sobre o campo da cultura no último quartel do século XVIII. Ao longo do século XVIII, percecionamos um confronto entre dois paradigmas, o tradicional e o moderno, que produz-se no termo entre a ordem pública e a privada, entre a fruição das letras e o domínio das regras de utilização da palavra. Da mesma
forma, nas comunidades de convívio intelectual cedo se fazem notar as categorias de pensamento das Luzes.
Na análise do campo da cultura setecentista, abordamos as interações entre a
produção, o consumo de ideias e a comunicação das mesmas, entre as representações coletivas e as condutas pessoais, das instituições e das suas práticas, de modo a uma
melhor compreensão do novo espaço público, em que se projetam as tensões ideológicas da segunda metade de Setecentos.
Com esse objetivo, propomo-nos elaborar uma análise do perfil e das redes de contactos dos intelectuais, identificando as suas sociabilidades, as relações entre si e com a Corte. Consideramos igualmente indispensável um estudo sobre o mecenato e a
clientela, numa relação de patrocínio e proteção, sendo relevante a elaboração de redes mais ou menos formais de colaboração, quer entre indivíduos quer entre as instituições de cariz cultural que os acolhem. Sendo o tema central da tese o campo da cultura nos últimos decénios do século XVIII, com ênfase nos intelectuais, nas sociabilidades e na Corte, realçámos os perfis de alguns doutos portugueses que, a nosso ver, podiam ter contribuído para a divulgação do novo programa das Luzes, e que mais se destacaram nos diferentes círculos de convívio intelectual e na Corte. Tal como pretendemos elaborar uma representação dos intelectuais, parece-nos
também importante compreender a atuação da soberana, avaliando o que conseguiu ou não implementar, o que pode ter a sua marca e o que pode ser influência das personalidades que a rodeiam.
Desta forma, procuramos atender ao campo de interações entre a produção e o consumo de ideias e a comunicação, as representações coletivas e as condutas pessoais, através das obras, das instituições e das suas práticas, bem como da transmissão epistolar, para melhor compreendermos este novo espaço público, onde se podem projetar as tensões ideológicas de finais do século XVIII.
Upon reflection on the Portuguese society and its representations during the effective government of Queen Maria I, between 1777 and 1792, we seem to lack a more detailed perception of the relationship between the authors and the recipients of cultural production, as well as of the spaces in which it is legitimised. With this research, we intend to question how the articulation between spaces, both public and private, and the authors and the recipients of cultural production allows us to relate ideas with cultural practices, and to present a relational view on the field of culture in the last quarter of the eighteenth century. Throughout this period there was a confrontation between two paradigms, the traditional and the modern, which took place in the middle ground between public and private order, between the enjoyment of letters and the mastery of the rules of the use of words. Similarly, the categories of thought of the Enlightenment were soon to be seen in the communities of intellectual conviviality. By analysing the field of eighteenth-century culture, we looked at the interactions between the production and consumption of ideas and their communication, between collective representations and personal behaviour, institutions and their practices, in order to better understand the new public space in which underwent the ideological tensions of the second half of the eighteenth century. To this end, we intend to analyse the profile and the networks of intellectuals. We will identify their social circles, their relationships with each other and with the Court. We also consider it essential to study patronage and clientele, in a relationship of sponsorship and protection. It is important to analyse more or less formal networks of collaboration, both among individuals and among the cultural institutions that hosted them. Since the central theme of the thesis is the field of culture in the last decades of the eighteenth century, focusing on intellectuals, society and the Court, we have highlighted the profiles of some Portuguese scholars who, according to us, could have contributed to spreading the new programme of the Enlightenment, and who stood out the most in the various intellectual circles and at Court. Just as we want to develop a representation of the intellectuals, it also seems important to us to understand the actions of the Sovereign, to assess what she has or hasn't managed to implement, what she may have left behind, and what may have been influenced by the personalities surrounding her. Thus, in order to better understand this new public space in which the ideological tensions of the late eighteenth century were projected, we seek to explore the field of interactions between the production and consumption of ideas and communication, collective representations and personal behaviour, through works, institutions and their practices, and epistolary transmission.
Upon reflection on the Portuguese society and its representations during the effective government of Queen Maria I, between 1777 and 1792, we seem to lack a more detailed perception of the relationship between the authors and the recipients of cultural production, as well as of the spaces in which it is legitimised. With this research, we intend to question how the articulation between spaces, both public and private, and the authors and the recipients of cultural production allows us to relate ideas with cultural practices, and to present a relational view on the field of culture in the last quarter of the eighteenth century. Throughout this period there was a confrontation between two paradigms, the traditional and the modern, which took place in the middle ground between public and private order, between the enjoyment of letters and the mastery of the rules of the use of words. Similarly, the categories of thought of the Enlightenment were soon to be seen in the communities of intellectual conviviality. By analysing the field of eighteenth-century culture, we looked at the interactions between the production and consumption of ideas and their communication, between collective representations and personal behaviour, institutions and their practices, in order to better understand the new public space in which underwent the ideological tensions of the second half of the eighteenth century. To this end, we intend to analyse the profile and the networks of intellectuals. We will identify their social circles, their relationships with each other and with the Court. We also consider it essential to study patronage and clientele, in a relationship of sponsorship and protection. It is important to analyse more or less formal networks of collaboration, both among individuals and among the cultural institutions that hosted them. Since the central theme of the thesis is the field of culture in the last decades of the eighteenth century, focusing on intellectuals, society and the Court, we have highlighted the profiles of some Portuguese scholars who, according to us, could have contributed to spreading the new programme of the Enlightenment, and who stood out the most in the various intellectual circles and at Court. Just as we want to develop a representation of the intellectuals, it also seems important to us to understand the actions of the Sovereign, to assess what she has or hasn't managed to implement, what she may have left behind, and what may have been influenced by the personalities surrounding her. Thus, in order to better understand this new public space in which the ideological tensions of the late eighteenth century were projected, we seek to explore the field of interactions between the production and consumption of ideas and communication, collective representations and personal behaviour, through works, institutions and their practices, and epistolary transmission.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
D. Maria I Campo de Cultura Intelectuais Sociabilidade Relational turn Século XVIII Field of culture Queen Maria I Intellectuals Relational turn 18th century Sociability