A carregar...
Publicação
Trends in scientific editing and good research practices
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 290.62 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Objective: To verify researchers-nurses’ knowledge about trends in scientific publishing and good research practices. Method: A descriptive study carried out through an online survey with 197 nurses holding master’s and/or doctoral degrees from all Brazilian regions. To raise knowledge, a validated, self-administered and anonymous questionnaire with 18 questions on the subject was used. Descriptive and inferential analyzes were performed on researchers’ scores (Mann-Whitney test). Results: Among the specific questions, the mean of correct answers was 7.1: 6.4 for master’s and 7.4 for doctoral degree holders. There was a significant difference in the mean of correct answers between masters and doctors (p = 0.025), and between productivity scholarship holders and non-scholarship holders (p = 0.021), according to mean difference tests. Questions about predatory editorial practices were those in which researchers had the worst knowledge.
Descrição
Funding Information: The project adopted the acronym Rn_in_Science and its research universe is researchers-nurses with a master’s and/or doctoral degree, registered on the Lattes platform managed by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq – Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) of Brazil. To delimit the sample, the universe of master’s and doctoral degree holders in nursing provided by the Ministry of Education of Brazil was considered(15), adopting a 95% confidence interval and a margin of error of 0.70 and using the formula for finite population, calculated in G.Power, requiring 180 participants. Publisher Copyright: © 2021,Revista da Escola de Enfermagem.All Rights Reserved
Palavras-chave
Knowledge Nursing Publishing Research Research personnel Scholarly communication General Nursing