A carregar...
Publicação
No right to perform a contract?
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.52 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
This thesis offers an alternative outlook on the decision of a contractual party to
reject the benefit of the contract when he is no longer interested in the other party's performance.
It is an attempt to justify such course of action by challenging the proposition that one
is always entitled to perform one's own contractual promises. This shall be clone in the context
of the controversial decision of the House of Lords in White & Carter (Councils) v McGregor
[ 1962] AC 413, a case where the insistent performer happened to be able to complete h is part
of the contract without the need for his customer's cooperation and even against his expressed
will.
ln a large number of cases the provider of a service will have no other interest in actually
performing h is part of the contract beyond that of securing h is right to the full contract price.
This thesis argues that whenever that is the case the courts should acknowledge both the service
recipient's right to renounce the benefit ofthe contract and his power to prevent tl1e unwanted
supply of services, whether by words o r conduct. The service provi der who has been discharged
from h is duty to perform will be adequately protected so long as his right to the full contract
price is not at stake. He has no need for a 'right to perform' in its proper sense.
However, he should not end up better off than h e would have been had he actually performed
h is part of the contract. Therefore, the abdicating party should be allowed to deduct from
the contract price by way of set-off whichever sums the former has saved o r otherwise made as
a consequence of h is early release.
Descrição
Thesis submitted in Trinity Term 2001 for the degree of Master of Philosophy, Worcester College, Oxford
Palavras-chave
Contratos