Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Portuguese primary care physicians response rate in surveys

2018-03Recensão Acesso aberto
Ver registo simples
dc.contributor.authorBasílio, Nuno
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Sara
dc.contributor.authorNunes, José Mendes
dc.contributor.authorLaranjo, Liliana
dc.contributor.authorDa Luz Antunes, Maria
dc.contributor.authorHeleno, BRuno
dc.contributor.authorHeleno, Bruno
dc.contributor.institutionNOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)
dc.contributor.institutionCentro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC)
dc.contributor.institutionEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)
dc.contributor.institutionCentro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas (CEDOC)
dc.contributor.pblAMB - Associação Médica Brasileira
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-22T22:16:57Z
dc.date.available2023-02-22T22:16:57Z
dc.date.issued2018-03
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Surveys are a useful tool in primary care. However, low response rates can introduce selection bias, impairing both external and internal validity. The aim of this study was to assess the average response rate in surveys with Portuguese general practitioners (GPs). Method: We searched the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, PsychInfo, SciELO, IndexRMP, RCAAP, Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar, Acta Médica Portuguesa and the proceedings of conferences of general practice from incepton to December 2016. We included all postal, e-mail, telephone and personal surveys to primary care physicians without language restrictions. We did not assess risk of bias of included studies, since the main outcome was survey response rate. We performed planned subgroup analyses of the use of monetary incentives, the use of non-monetary incentives, survey delivery modes and prior contact with participants. Results: A total of 1,094 papers were identified and 37 studies were included in this review. The response rate in surveys done to Portuguese GPs was 56% (95CI 47-64%). There was substantial heterogeneity among included studies (I2=99%), but subgroup analysis did not explain this heterogeneity. Conclusion: Consistent with other published studies, the average response rate in surveys done with Portuguese GPs was 56%, with substantial variation among studies. Use of monetary incentives, one of the most effective strategies to increase response rates, was not present in any of the included studies.en
dc.description.versionpublishersversion
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.extent9
dc.format.extent228310
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1806-9282.64.03.272
dc.identifier.issn0104-4230
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 18176231
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: c226e1d8-b499-48ea-8f05-cea8c65b43d8
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85045302809
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 29641772
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000429488900013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/149553
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85045302809
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.subjectFamily practice
dc.subjectPhysicians
dc.subjectPortugal
dc.subjectPrimary health care
dc.subjectSurveys and questionnaires
dc.subjectGeneral Medicine
dc.titlePortuguese primary care physicians response rate in surveysen
dc.title.subtitleA systematic reviewen
dc.typereview
degois.publication.firstPage272
degois.publication.issue3
degois.publication.lastPage280
degois.publication.titleRevista da associacao medica brasileira
degois.publication.volume64
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.familyNameHeleno
person.givenNameBruno
person.identifier.ciencia-id8B1D-AC7D-5CB2
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3943-1858
person.identifier.scopus-author-id54937604600
rcaap.rightsopenAccess
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2a89b92b-0b51-4df1-911c-da2e71efae1b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2a89b92b-0b51-4df1-911c-da2e71efae1b

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nome:
QaR7_u7F.pdf
Tamanho:
222.96 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Ver/Abrir

Coleções

NMS: CEDOC - Artigos em revista internacional com arbitragem científica