Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Is social prescribing feasible in Türkiye?

dc.contributor.authorAkyon, Seyma Handan
dc.contributor.authorBaser, Duygu Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorYazıcı, Ebrar
dc.contributor.authorRıdvan, Hanin Hicazi
dc.contributor.authorSencan, Irfan
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Cristiano
dc.contributor.institutionEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)
dc.contributor.institutionCentro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC)
dc.contributor.institutionComprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC) - Pólo ENSP
dc.contributor.pblBioMed Central (BMC)
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-14T11:45:01Z
dc.date.available2026-07-14T11:45:01Z
dc.date.issued2026-12
dc.descriptionPublisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2026.
dc.description.abstractBackground: Social prescribing (SP) addresses patients’ non-medical needs by connecting them to community-based services through structured referral pathways. While established in many European countries, SP remains unfamiliar in Türkiye. This qualitative focus group study examines family medicine resident doctors’ perspectives on the applicability of SP in Turkish primary care. Methods: This single-centre qualitative study employed online focus group discussions (FGDs). Fourteen family medicine resident doctors were recruited and grouped into three focus sessions. Before the interviews, participants attended a one-hour briefing on the concept of SP. Data were collected through FGDs guided by a semi-structured interview guide, which were audio-recorded with consent and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were anonymised and analysed in MAXQDA using inductive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke). Coding was conducted independently by two researchers and finalised through consensus meetings. Reporting follows the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Results: Analysis yielded 292 codes organized into five themes: conceptual ambiguity, perceived benefits, the central role of family doctors, feasibility barriers and enablers, and training needs. Resident physicians viewed SP as aligned with holistic family medicine but identified multi-level barriers at the clinician level (time/workload), patient level (motivation/costs), and system level (coordination/capacity). They proposed corresponding enablers: physician training, public awareness campaigns, individualized planning, multi-stakeholder coordination, and institutional support. Conclusion: Resident doctors are cautiously optimistic about SP but emphasise practical constraints. They recommended priority actions including concise training, clear referral and feedback pathways with a defined social prescribing link worker, asset mapping, and multi-stakeholder collaboration supported by basic monitoring and evaluation. Pilot implementations in Family Health Centres could test feasibility and inform scale-up and curriculum integration.en
dc.description.versionpublishersversion
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.extent1956754
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12875-026-03316-3
dc.identifier.issn2731-4553
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 168316848
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 5619a5d5-b3ca-41d8-bf76-20ac7e708fa7
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 105040802582
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 41992122
dc.identifier.otherPubMedCentral: PMC13231771
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 001782969300001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/204499
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105040802582
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.subjectCommunity health services
dc.subjectImplementation
dc.subjectPrimary health care
dc.subjectQualitative research
dc.subjectSocial prescribing
dc.subjectFamily Practice
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
dc.titleIs social prescribing feasible in Türkiye?en
dc.title.subtitleyoung family doctors’ perspectives: a focus group studyen
dc.typejournal article
degois.publication.issue1
degois.publication.titleBMC Primary Care
degois.publication.volume27
dspace.entity.typePublication
rcaap.rightsopenAccess

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
Akyon_2026_BMC_Primary_Care_27_220.pdf
Tamanho:
1.87 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format