Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Content and quality of physical activity ontologies

dc.contributor.authorBraun, Maya
dc.contributor.authorCarlier, Stéphanie
dc.contributor.authorDe Backere, Femke
dc.contributor.authorDe Paepe, Annick
dc.contributor.authorVan De Velde, Marie
dc.contributor.authorVan Dyck, Delfien
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Marta M.
dc.contributor.authorDe Turck, Filip
dc.contributor.authorCrombez, Geert
dc.contributor.institutionNOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)
dc.contributor.institutionComprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC) - pólo NMS
dc.contributor.pblBioMed Central (BMC)
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-27T22:14:49Z
dc.date.available2023-03-27T22:14:49Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-13
dc.descriptionFunding Information: This study is part of an interdisciplinary research project, funded by the Special Research Fund (Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds) of Ghent University.
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Ontologies are a formal way to represent knowledge in a particular field and have the potential to transform the field of health promotion and digital interventions. However, few researchers in physical activity (PA) are familiar with ontologies, and the field can be difficult to navigate. This systematic review aims to (1) identify ontologies in the field of PA, (2) assess their content and (3) assess their quality. Methods: Databases were searched for ontologies on PA. Ontologies were included if they described PA or sedentary behavior, and were available in English language. We coded whether ontologies covered the user profile, activity, or context domain. For the assessment of quality, we used 12 criteria informed by the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontology (OBO) Foundry principles of good ontology practice. Results: Twenty-eight ontologies met the inclusion criteria. All ontologies covered PA, and 19 included information on the user profile. Context was covered by 17 ontologies (physical context, n = 12; temporal context, n = 14; social context: n = 5). Ontologies met an average of 4.3 out of 12 quality criteria. No ontology met all quality criteria. Discussion: This review did not identify a single comprehensive ontology of PA that allowed reuse. Nonetheless, several ontologies may serve as a good starting point for the promotion of PA. We provide several recommendations about the identification, evaluation, and adaptation of ontologies for their further development and use.en
dc.description.versionpublishersversion
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.extent2393915
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12966-023-01428-y
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 56820873
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 8203c0e1-c7f7-4526-8e6d-bb7c56f7e4c3
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85150219331
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 36907890
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/151289
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85150219331
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.subjectClassification
dc.subjectOntology
dc.subjectPhysical activity
dc.subjectQuality assessment
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectMedicine (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
dc.subjectNutrition and Dietetics
dc.titleContent and quality of physical activity ontologiesen
dc.title.subtitlea systematic reviewen
dc.typereview
degois.publication.issue1
degois.publication.titleInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
degois.publication.volume20
dspace.entity.typePublication
rcaap.rightsopenAccess

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
s12966_023_01428_y.pdf
Tamanho:
2.28 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format