Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Patient-reported outcome measures in rehabilitation after knee surgery

2026Recensão Acesso aberto
Ver registo simples
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, José
dc.contributor.authorMiguel, Susana
dc.contributor.authorDelgado, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorBoto, Paulo
dc.contributor.institutionCentro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC)
dc.contributor.institutionComprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC) - Pólo ENSP
dc.contributor.institutionEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)
dc.contributor.pblSpringer Verlag
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-19T01:07:22Z
dc.date.available2024-06-19T01:07:22Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.descriptionFunding Information: Open access funding provided by FCT|FCCN (b-on). The present publication was funded by Funda\u00E7\u00E3o Ci\u00EAncia e Tecnologia, IP national support through CHRC (UIDB/04923/2020). Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.
dc.description.abstractAim: Musculoskeletal conditions impact our society owing to the associated burden, with significant implications for health systems and people’s quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to optimize the results of rehabilitation programs. The study aims to identify the PROMs used in rehabilitation programs after knee surgery. Subject and methods: This rapid systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE® and CINAHL® databases, considering all studies carried out until December 2023, with a registered protocol (PROSPERO reference: CRD42024504263). Studies were included with adult participants undergoing knee surgery and using PROMs to measure outcomes before and after rehabilitation programs. Results: Sixteen studies with 3469 participants in rehabilitation programs after knee surgery were included. Methodologically and according to the criteria recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute, more than half of the studies were of high quality, with values of more than 80%, including randomized controlled trials, cohorts, and quasi-experimental designs. Outcomes were assessed before and after rehabilitation programs, using general (n = 6) and knee-specific (n = 11) PROMs. Of all the PROMs identified in the different studies selected for this systematic review, the ones used the most were KOOS (in 14 studies), EQ5D-5L, and WOMAC (in 3 studies). Conclusion: This rapid systematic review shows the need to identify and implement PROMs during rehabilitation programs after knee surgery, measuring participants’ health status, symptoms, treatment satisfaction, and physical and mental performance. In this way, it is possible to make value-based comparisons with other interventions, improving and tailoring rehabilitation care.en
dc.description.versionpublishersversion
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.extent1131095
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10389-024-02283-2
dc.identifier.issn2198-1833
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 93570900
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 917cfc25-087d-4237-885f-c1467f850c6c
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85193620350
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 001228206800001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/168758
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85193620350
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.subjectKnee surgery
dc.subjectPatient-centered outcomes research
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcome measures
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
dc.titlePatient-reported outcome measures in rehabilitation after knee surgeryen
dc.title.subtitlea rapid systematic reviewen
dc.typereview
degois.publication.firstPage437
degois.publication.issue2
degois.publication.lastPage451
degois.publication.titleJournal of Public Health (Germany)
degois.publication.volume34
dspace.entity.typePublication
rcaap.rightsopenAccess

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nome:
Moreira_J_Pub_Health_online_2024.pdf
Tamanho:
1.08 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Ver/Abrir

Coleções

Home collection (ENSP)