Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Hard-to-reach populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers

dc.contributor.authorBarros, Ana B
dc.contributor.authorDias, Sónia Maria Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorMartins, MR
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT)
dc.contributor.institutionGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM)
dc.contributor.institutionPopulation health, policies and services (PPS)
dc.contributor.pblBioMed Central (BMC)
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-11T22:03:22Z
dc.date.available2018-05-11T22:03:22Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-30
dc.descriptionPMCID: 4627393 PMID: 26518345
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: In public health, hard-to-reach populations are often recruited by non-probabilistic sampling methods that produce biased results. In order to overcome this, several sampling methods have been improved and developed in the last years. The aim of this systematic review was to identify all current methods used to survey most-at-risk populations of men who have sex with men and sex workers. The review also aimed to assess if there were any relations between the study populations and the sampling methods used to recruit them. Lastly, we wanted to assess if the number of publications originated in middle and low human development (MLHD) countries had been increasing in the last years. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases and a total of 268 published studies were included in the analysis. RESULTS: In this review, 11 recruitment methods were identified. Semi-probabilistic methods were used most commonly to survey men who have sex with men, and the use of the Internet was the method that gathered more respondents. We found that female sex workers were more frequently recruited through non-probabilistic methods than men who have sex with men (odds = 2.2; p < 0.05; confidence interval (CI) [1.1-4.2]). In the last 6 years, the number of studies based in middle and low human development countries increased more than the number of studies based in very high and high human development countries (odds = 2.5; p < 0.05; CI [1.3-4.9]). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic literature review identified 11 methods used to sample men who have sex with men and female sex workers. There is an association between the type of sampling method and the population being studied. The number of studies based in middle and low human development countries has increased in the last 6 years of this study.en
dc.description.versionpublishersversion
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.extent787385
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13643-015-0129-9
dc.identifier.issn2046-4053
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 1804013
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 172595e2-b92a-4f7d-a469-ddbfa3b4b343
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 26518345
dc.identifier.otherPubMedCentral: PMC4627393
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84945541699
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7941-0285/work/69039759
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5085-0685/work/131110182
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/36597
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.subjectBibliometrics
dc.subjectBiomedical Research
dc.subjectDeveloping Countries
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHomosexuality, Male
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInternet
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectModels, Statistical
dc.subjectPatient Selection
dc.subjectPeriodicals as Topic
dc.subjectSelection Bias
dc.subjectSex Workers
dc.subjectJournal Article
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
dc.titleHard-to-reach populations of men who have sex with men and sex workersen
dc.title.subtitlea systematic review on sampling methodsen
dc.typejournal article
degois.publication.titleSystematic reviews
degois.publication.volume4
dspace.entity.typePublication
rcaap.rightsopenAccess

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
Hard_to_reach_populations_of_men_who_have_sex_with_men_and_sex_workers.pdf
Tamanho:
768.93 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format