Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/62928
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorAyuso, Mercedes-
dc.contributor.authorBravo, Jorge-
dc.contributor.authorHolzmann, Robert-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-11T23:03:35Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-11T23:03:35Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn2364‐1428-
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 12010569-
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: cf1313cb-d3ac-4c08-9f3e-e3fe0bd2fc97-
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7389-5103/work/59471636-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/62928-
dc.descriptionAyuso, M., Bravo, J., & Holzmann, R. (2018). Getting Life Expectancy Estimates Right for Pension Policy: Period versus Cohort Approach. (pp. 1-30). (CESifo Working Papers; No. 7349). Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research ‐ CESifo GmbH.-
dc.description.abstractIn many policy areas it is essential to use the best estimates of life expectancy, but it is vital to most areas of pension policy. This paper presents the conceptual differences between static period and dynamic cohort mortality tables, estimates the differences in life expectancy for Portugal and Spain, and compares official estimates of both life expectancy estimates for Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States for 1981, 2010, and 2060. These comparisons reveal major differences between period and cohort life expectancy in and between countries and across years. The implications of using wrong estimates for pension policy, including financial sustainability, are explored.en
dc.format.extent30-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMunich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research ‐ CESifo GmbH-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectCross-country comparison-
dc.subjectLee-Carter-
dc.subjectLife expectancy indexation-
dc.subjectBalancing mechanism-
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being-
dc.titleGetting Life Expectancy Estimates Right for Pension Policy-
dc.typeworkingPaper-
degois.publication.firstPage1-
degois.publication.lastPage30-
dc.description.versionpublishersversion-
dc.description.versionpublished-
dc.title.subtitlePeriod versus Cohort Approach-
dc.contributor.institutionNOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS)-
dc.contributor.institutionInformation Management Research Center (MagIC) - NOVA Information Management School-
Aparece nas colecções:NIMS - Working Papers

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
MAyuso_JBravo_RHolzman_2018.pdf1,08 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.