Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/189079
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Vorobeva, Darina | - |
dc.contributor.author | Voyer, Benjamin | - |
dc.contributor.author | González-Jiménez, Héctor | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pinto, Diego Costa | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-07T21:22:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-10-07T21:22:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025-05-27 | - |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 131618039 | - |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: daa1c999-90de-4908-aec6-22b482854390 | - |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0003-4418-9450/work/193715021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/189079 | - |
dc.description | Vorobeva, D., Voyer, B., González-Jiménez, H., & Pinto, D. C. (2025). Research Agenda on Artificial Intelligence as a Teammate: A Conceptual Framework of Collaboration Dynamics and Paradoxes [abstract]. Abstract from European Marketing Academy (EMAC) Spring Conference 2025, Madrid, Spain. https://proceedings.emac-online.org/pdfs/A2025-124292.pdf --- This work received partial support from national funds through FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia), under the project – UIDB/04152/2020 – Centro de Investigação em Gestão de Informação (MagIC)/NOVA IMS and 2021.09496.BD. | - |
dc.description.abstract | This conceptual paper explores the distinct roles AI can assume in augmented teams (human employees and artificial entities) and the resulting implications for organizational dynamics. By examining existing literature on human-technology collaboration, three primary AI roles are identified: assistant, collaborator, and decision-maker. Each role is associated with critical success factors in teamwork: productivity, coordination, and autonomy. A conceptual framework is developed to align these roles with collaboration factors, shedding light on their impact within augmented teams. Additionally, three paradoxes are presented: the Productivity vs. Amotivation Paradox, the Trust in Autonomy vs. Skepticism Paradox, and the Coordination vs. Disconnection Paradox, highlighting challenges that arise from integrating AI in teams. This study contributes to understanding the complexities of human-AI collaboration, offering strategies to maximize synergies while mitigating risks. | en |
dc.format.extent | 2 | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | European Marketing Academy (EMAC) | - |
dc.relation | https://doi.org/10.54499/2021.09496.BD | - |
dc.rights | openAccess | - |
dc.subject | artificial intelligence | - |
dc.subject | collaboration | - |
dc.subject | augmented team | - |
dc.subject | SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth | - |
dc.title | Research Agenda on Artificial Intelligence as a Teammate | - |
dc.type | conferenceObject | - |
degois.publication.title | Proceedings of the European Marketing Academy | - |
degois.publication.title | European Marketing Academy (EMAC) Spring Conference 2025 | - |
dc.peerreviewed | yes | - |
dc.description.version | publishersversion | - |
dc.description.version | published | - |
dc.title.subtitle | A Conceptual Framework of Collaboration Dynamics and Paradoxes [abstract] | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Information Management Research Center (MagIC) - NOVA Information Management School | - |
dc.contributor.institution | NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS) | - |
Appears in Collections: | NIMS: MagIC - Documentos de conferências internacionais |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Research_Agenda_on_Artificial_Intelligence_as_a_Teammate.pdf | 171,77 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.