Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/184474| Title: | Bone histomorphometry for the diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy – a European consensus statement |
| Author: | Lafage-Proust, Marie Helene Jørgensen, Hanne Skou Bravenboer, Nathalie Ferreira, Anibal Bégin, Marie Josée Cannata-Andía, Jorge B Cejka, Daniel Chavassieux, Pascale Cohen-Solal, Martine D'Haese, Patrick Fahrleitner-Pammer, Astrid Ferreira, Ana Carina Fusaro, Maria Gerbaix, Maude Hamdy, Neveen Hansen, Ditte de Jongh, Renate Kröger, Heikki Lalayiannis, Alexander D. Salam, Syazrah Spasovski, Goce Shroff, Rukshana Tong, Xiao Yu Trombetti, Andrea Ureña, Pablo Bacchetta, Justine Mazzaferro, Sandro Haarhaus, Mathias Evenepoel, Pieter |
| Keywords: | Bone biopsy Bone histomorphometry Chronic kidney disease Chronic kidney disease – mineral and bone disorder Human Osteoporosis Renal osteodystrophy Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Physiology Histology SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being |
| Issue Date: | Oct-2025 |
| Abstract: | Histomorphometric analysis of an iliac bone biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy (ROD), which comprises various histological lesions induced by chronic kidney disease (CKD). ROD belongs to the framework of CKD-associated osteoporosis. The use of bone biopsy in the routine management of CKD-associated osteoporosis has decreased over the past decades for various reasons, including diminishing expertise in performing the procedure, and major variability in processing bone samples and reporting of results. In this context, the European Renal Osteodystrophy group, a part of the CKD-mineral and bone disorder working group of the European Renal Association launched an initiative to evaluate various issues related to bone histomorphometry in the context of ROD. To this effect, 28 experts from 14 European countries engaged in rounds of discussions to reach a consensus related to the bone biopsy procedure, sample handling, and reading and reporting findings. Key conclusions include a recommendation that all practitioners in this field move towards reporting diagnostic findings by the turnover, mineralization, and volume (TMV) classification and that external quality control is prioritized to ensure validity and reproducibility of results. The consensus group recognises that the lack of an accepted normative reference for bone histomorphometry is a barrier towards uniform diagnostic definitions and recommends further collaborative efforts in this area. Until these issues are solved, transparent reporting on the choice of reference and diagnostic definitions applied should be adhered to, both in clinical reports and research settings. |
| Description: | Funding Information: This consensus work was not supported by any commercial entity. HS J\u00F8rgensen was supported by a European Renal Association Long-term Fellowship when this work was conducted. Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s) |
| Peer review: | yes |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/184474 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2025.117544 |
| ISSN: | 8756-3282 |
| Appears in Collections: | NMS - Artigos em revista internacional com arbitragem científica |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-s2.0-S8756328225001565-main.pdf | 5,46 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.











