Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/181540| Título: | Bronchodilator responsiveness and future chronic airflow obstruction |
| Autor: | Knox-Brown, Ben Algharbi, Fahad Mulhern, Octavia Potts, James Harrabi, Imed Janson, Christer Nielsen, Rune Agarwal, Dhiraj Malinovschi, Andrei Juvekar, Sanjay Denguezli, Miriam Gíslason, Thorarinn Ahmed, Rana Nafees, Asaad Koul, Parvaiz A. Obaseki, Daniel Anand, Mahesh Padukudru Loh, Li Cher Dias, Hermínia Brites Rodrigues, Fátima Mannino, David Elbiaze, Mohammed El Rhazi, Karima Mejza, Filip Devereux, Graham Franssen, Frits M.E. El Sony, Asma Wouters, Emiel Al Ghobain, Mohammed Mortimer, Kevin Rashid, Abdul Osman, Rashid Studnicka, Michael Cardoso, Joao Burney, Peter Amaral, Andre F.S. |
| Palavras-chave: | Asthma Bronchodilator COPD Epidemiology Spirometry Medicine(all) |
| Data: | Mar-2025 |
| Resumo: | Background: Bronchodilator responsiveness testing is mainly used for diagnosing asthma. We aimed to investigate whether it is associated with progression to chronic airflow obstruction over time. Methods: The multinational Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease cohort study surveyed adults, aged 40 years and above, at baseline and followed them up after a mean of 9.1 years. Recruitment took place between January 2, 2003 and December 26, 2016. Follow-up measurements were collected between January 29, 2019 and October 24, 2021. On both occasions, study participants provided information on respiratory symptoms, health status and several environmental and lifestyle exposures. They also underwent pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry. We defined bronchodilator responsiveness at baseline using the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) 2022 definition, and the presence of chronic airflow obstruction at follow-up as a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1/FVC) less than the lower limit of normal. We used multi-level regression models to estimate the association between baseline bronchodilator responsiveness and incident chronic airflow obstruction. We stratified analyses by gender and performed a sensitivity analysis in never smokers. Findings: We analysed data from 3701 adults with 56% being women. Compared to those without bronchodilator responsiveness at baseline, those with bronchodilator responsiveness had 36% increased risk of developing chronic airflow obstruction (RR: 1.36, 95%CI 1.04, 1.80). This effect was stronger in women (RR: 1.45, 95%CI 1.09, 1.91) than men (RR: 1.07, 95%CI 0.51, 2.24). Never smokers with bronchodilator responsiveness also were at greater risk of incident chronic airflow obstruction (RR: 1.48, 95%CI 1.01, 2.20). Interpretation: Bronchodilator responsiveness appears to be a risk factor for incident chronic airflow obstruction. It is important that future studies in other large population-based cohorts replicate these findings. Funding: National Heart and Lung Institute, UK Medical Research Council, and Wellcome Trust. |
| Descrição: | Funding Information: Acknowledgements: We thank all participants and staff for their time and effort put into this study. Infrastructure support for this research was provided by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). Funding Information: National Heart and Lung Institute, UK Medical Research Council, and Wellcome Trust.We thank all participants and staff for their time and effort put into this study. Infrastructure support for this research was provided by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). Funding Information: Declaration of interests: DM declares being a consultant to and receiving royalties from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, and the COPD Foundation (royalty payments are up to date) and acting as an expert witness for Schlesinger Law Firm, outside of the submitted work. RN reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis, outside of the submitted work. FR reports grants and personal fees from A. Menarini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva Pharma, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, VitalAire and Nippon Gases outside the submitted work. FF reports consulting fees from Sanofi and MSD, as well as personal and institutional fees from Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work. AA reports research grants from the COLT foundation outside of the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests. Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s) |
| Peer review: | yes |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/181540 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103123 |
| ISSN: | 2589-5370 |
| Aparece nas colecções: | NMS - Artigos em revista internacional com arbitragem científica |
Ficheiros deste registo:
| Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-s2.0-S2589537025000550-main.pdf | 627,84 kB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |
Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.











