Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/179814
Título: | Extraction of pesticides from soil using direct-immersion SPME LC-Tips followed by GC–MS/MS |
Autor: | Brinco, João Carvalho, Raquel Silva, Marco Gomes da Guedes, Paula Ribeiro, Alexandra B. Mateus, Eduardo P. |
Palavras-chave: | Analysis Direct immersion SPME Pesticide Soil soil pesticide extraction |
Data: | Out-2024 |
Resumo: | A new method was evaluated and developed for the analysis of pesticides in sandy-loam soil by direct-immersion solid phase microextraction (DI-SPME) followed by gas chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS) determination. Ten pesticides were selected based on a literature survey of the compounds reported to be present in EU soils. The extraction was performed using SPME LC-Tips, a new SPME configuration with the coated fibers attached to a disposable and easy-to-handle micropipette tip, which was immersed into a soil slurry made by the addition of an aqueous solution to the soil sample. Ten experimental parameters were evaluated with a Plackett-Burman design, after which the extraction time and percentage of organic solvent in the aqueous extraction were optimized separately. The two fiber chemistries available (PDMS/DVB and C18) were evaluated in parallel for the entire work. In the final method, slurry samples were made by adding an aqueous solution (6 % methanol v/v) to 2 g of soil. The fiber was conditioned and then inserted, for extraction, into the samples, stirred by a magnetic bar. Afterwards, the analytes were desorbed onto 100 µL of methanol. After the addition of analyte protectants (ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol) the extract was injected into the GC–MS/MS system. Isotopically labelled penconazole was used as internal standard. A calibration was performed by extracting spiked soil with analyte concentrations of 0.1–50 µg/kg. Coefficients of determination of the linear calibration were between 0.94–0.98 for the PDMS/DVB and 0.92–0.99 for the C18. Limits of detection range between 0.01–10 µg/kg for the PDMS/DVB and 0.1–10 µg/kg for the C18. Overall, the C18 analytically outperformed the PDMS/DVB but required a longer extraction time (120 min vs 75 min for the PDMS/DVB). This method allows automation and generates low residual toxic waste, having the potential to be introduced as a greener and simpler alternative to currently used sample preparation methodologies. |
Descrição: | LAQV/REQUIMTE (UID/QUI/50006/2020). UI/BD/150867/2021. CEECIND/01969/2020. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. |
Peer review: | yes |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/179814 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465295 |
ISSN: | 0021-9673 |
Aparece nas colecções: | Home collection (FCT) |
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0021967324006691-main.pdf | 2,02 MB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |
Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.