Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/152344
Título: | Technical, Environmental, and Cost Assessment of Granite Sludge Valorisation |
Autor: | Surra, Elena Sousa, João Correia, Manuela Carvalheiras, João Labrincha, João A. Marques, José C. Lapa, Nuno Delerue-Matos, Cristina |
Palavras-chave: | disposal feldspar granite block cutting inert filler life cycle assessment life cycle cost Materials Science(all) Instrumentation Engineering(all) Process Chemistry and Technology Computer Science Applications Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production SDG 13 - Climate Action |
Data: | 2-Abr-2023 |
Resumo: | Featured Application: This work provides fundamental information regarding the technical, environmental, and economic viability of granite sludge valorisation as a substitute for feldspar in a ceramic paste and as a substitute for fine–medium inert in structural concrete. The granite sludge (GS) produced during block sawing can be exploited as alternative raw material in ceramic and concrete industries. Based on the case study of a Portuguese granite processing plant, this work analysed, by experimental tests and Environmental and Cost Life Cycle analyses, the feasibility of GS valorisation as a substitute (i) for feldspar in a ceramic paste and (ii) fine–medium inert filler in structural concrete. The results demonstrated that both the valorisation pathways are more advantageous than GS landfilling. Due to granulometric, mineralogical composition and shrinkage, GS can substitute feldspar in sandstone tiles or tableware products, although its tinting effect can limit noble whitish ceramic applications. In structural concrete mixes, 5% w/w GS instead of fine inert filler reduces the compressive strength and increases the water:cement ratio. The GS generates lower environmental impacts as a substitute for inert filler than as a substitute for feldspar in most of the impact categories analysed, even though the latter valorisation pathway provides higher benefits in Climate Change and the Depletion of Fossil resources, Water, and Ozone. If no monetary value is recognised for GS valorisation by the market, the sustainability of GS life cycle cost decreases when compared to its landfilling. |
Descrição: | Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. |
Peer review: | yes |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/152344 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074513 |
ISSN: | 2076-3417 |
Aparece nas colecções: | FCT: DQ - Artigos em revista internacional com arbitragem científica |
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Technical_Environmental_and_Cost_Assessment_of_Granite.pdf | 2,15 MB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |
Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.