Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/152344
Título: Technical, Environmental, and Cost Assessment of Granite Sludge Valorisation
Autor: Surra, Elena
Sousa, João
Correia, Manuela
Carvalheiras, João
Labrincha, João A.
Marques, José C.
Lapa, Nuno
Delerue-Matos, Cristina
Palavras-chave: disposal
feldspar
granite block cutting
inert filler
life cycle assessment
life cycle cost
Materials Science(all)
Instrumentation
Engineering(all)
Process Chemistry and Technology
Computer Science Applications
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
SDG 13 - Climate Action
Data: 2-Abr-2023
Resumo: Featured Application: This work provides fundamental information regarding the technical, environmental, and economic viability of granite sludge valorisation as a substitute for feldspar in a ceramic paste and as a substitute for fine–medium inert in structural concrete. The granite sludge (GS) produced during block sawing can be exploited as alternative raw material in ceramic and concrete industries. Based on the case study of a Portuguese granite processing plant, this work analysed, by experimental tests and Environmental and Cost Life Cycle analyses, the feasibility of GS valorisation as a substitute (i) for feldspar in a ceramic paste and (ii) fine–medium inert filler in structural concrete. The results demonstrated that both the valorisation pathways are more advantageous than GS landfilling. Due to granulometric, mineralogical composition and shrinkage, GS can substitute feldspar in sandstone tiles or tableware products, although its tinting effect can limit noble whitish ceramic applications. In structural concrete mixes, 5% w/w GS instead of fine inert filler reduces the compressive strength and increases the water:cement ratio. The GS generates lower environmental impacts as a substitute for inert filler than as a substitute for feldspar in most of the impact categories analysed, even though the latter valorisation pathway provides higher benefits in Climate Change and the Depletion of Fossil resources, Water, and Ozone. If no monetary value is recognised for GS valorisation by the market, the sustainability of GS life cycle cost decreases when compared to its landfilling.
Descrição: Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/152344
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074513
ISSN: 2076-3417
Aparece nas colecções:FCT: DQ - Artigos em revista internacional com arbitragem científica

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Technical_Environmental_and_Cost_Assessment_of_Granite.pdf2,15 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.