Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Is Metalinguistic Usage a Conversational Implicature?

2023-09Artigo científico Acesso aberto
Ver registo simples
dc.contributor.authorSoria-Ruiz, Andrés
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA)
dc.contributor.pblSpringer
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-30T01:52:54Z
dc.date.available2024-04-30T01:52:54Z
dc.date.issued2023-09
dc.descriptionUIDB/00183/2020 UIDP/00183/2020
dc.description.abstractI argue against the view that metalinguistic usage is a form of conversational implicature. That view, suggested by Thomasson (Anal Philos 57(4):1-28, 2016) and Belleri (Philos Stud 174(9):2211–2226, 2017), has been most recently fleshed out by Mankowitz (Synthese 199:5603–5622, 2021). I provide two types of criticism to the implicature view. From an empirical point of view, metalinguistic usage differs in key respects from standard cases of conversational implicature. From a conceptual standpoint, I argue that the calculation algorithm provided by the implicature view makes undesirable predictions. Although my main objective is negative, I end the paper by sketching an alternative neo-Stalnakerian view of metalinguistic usage, that can be gathered from work by Barker (Linguist Philos 25(1):1–36, 2002; Inquiry 56(2–3):240–257, 2013) and others.en
dc.description.versionpublishersversion
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.extent12
dc.format.extent401625
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11245-023-09944-z
dc.identifier.issn0167-7411
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 87856179
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f4fdd6c1-0583-4eb4-9a11-ece016dd78ed
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85167338518
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 001044833200001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/166761
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85167338518
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00183%2F2020/PT
dc.relationNOVA Institute of Philosophy
dc.relationNOVA Institute of Philosophy
dc.subjectConversational implicature
dc.subjectMetalinguistic negotiation
dc.subjectMetalinguistic usage
dc.subjectSemantic–pragmatic divide
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.titleIs Metalinguistic Usage a Conversational Implicature?en
dc.typejournal article
degois.publication.firstPage1027
degois.publication.issue4
degois.publication.lastPage1038
degois.publication.titleTopoi
degois.publication.volume42
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardNumberUIDB/00183/2020
oaire.awardNumberUIDP/00183/2020
oaire.awardTitleNOVA Institute of Philosophy
oaire.awardTitleNOVA Institute of Philosophy
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00183%2F2020/PT
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F00183%2F2020/PT
oaire.fundingStream6817 - DCRRNI ID
oaire.fundingStream6817 - DCRRNI ID
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
rcaap.rightsopenAccess
relation.isProjectOfPublication78283463-286e-42d7-8f32-b489e2ef4ae5
relation.isProjectOfPublication2a933043-2d71-42dd-af01-ec8e159e1912
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscovery78283463-286e-42d7-8f32-b489e2ef4ae5

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nome:
s11245-023-09944-z.pdf
Tamanho:
392.21 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Ver/Abrir

Coleções

FCSH: IFILNOVA - Artigos em revista internacional com arbitragem científica