Publicação
Controversias como método para anti-história
| dc.contributor.author | Tureta, César | |
| dc.contributor.author | Américo, Bruno | |
| dc.contributor.author | Clegg, Stewart | |
| dc.contributor.institution | NOVA School of Business and Economics (NOVA SBE) | |
| dc.contributor.pbl | Fundação Getulio Vargas | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-30T22:22:00Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-03-30T22:22:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Our aim is to develop and propose a method for ANTi-historians, using analysis of controversy as the starting point. Despite the theoretical and methodological development of the ANTi-history approach to the study of knowledge of the past and the creation of its history, there is room for method development based on controversy analysis. We ground our proposal in some of ANTi-history’s assumptions (relationalism, the symmetry principle, and multiplicity) and practical concepts (translation and politics of actor-networks). In addition, we recommend four criteria that researchers should use in choosing a controversy to serve as a starting point for investigation. Finally, we present five steps for investigating knowledge of the past and the creation of history. | en |
| dc.description.version | publishersversion | |
| dc.description.version | publishersversion | |
| dc.description.version | published | |
| dc.format.extent | 12 | |
| dc.format.extent | 370952 | |
| dc.format.extent | 389801 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1590/S0034-759020210105 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0034-7590 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE: 28940995 | |
| dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 3213ae6b-3b60-40d5-b45d-d3a79945d937 | |
| dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 85101560120 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/114762 | |
| dc.identifier.url | https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85101560120 | |
| dc.language.iso | por | |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | |
| dc.subject | actor-network theory | |
| dc.subject | ANTi-history | |
| dc.subject | controversies | |
| dc.subject | historic turn | |
| dc.subject | organizational history | |
| dc.subject | Business and International Management | |
| dc.subject | Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous) | |
| dc.subject | Industrial relations | |
| dc.subject | Strategy and Management | |
| dc.subject | Management Science and Operations Research | |
| dc.subject | Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management | |
| dc.subject | Information Systems and Management | |
| dc.subject | Marketing | |
| dc.subject | Management of Technology and Innovation | |
| dc.subject | SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure | |
| dc.title | Controversias como método para anti-história | pt |
| dc.title.alternative | Controversies as method for anti-history | en |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| degois.publication.firstPage | 1 | |
| degois.publication.issue | 1 | |
| degois.publication.lastPage | 12 | |
| degois.publication.title | Revista de Administração de Empresas (RAE) | |
| degois.publication.volume | 61 | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| rcaap.rights | openAccess |