Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Pseudoscience Charges and the Demarcation Problem

dc.contributor.authorPaulon, Moreno
dc.contributor.institutionCHAM - Centro de Humanidades
dc.contributor.pblEstonian Association for the History and Philosophy of Science
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-06T23:55:34Z
dc.date.available2024-02-06T23:55:34Z
dc.date.issued2023-09
dc.descriptionUIDB/04666/2020 UIDP/04666/2020 UI/BD/151195/2021
dc.description.abstractPhilosophers of science have long tried to identify some demarcation line capable of distinguishing science from pseudoscience. Nonetheless, no ultimate set of requirements has so far been achieved, leaving demarcation uncertain and fluctuating, if not merely rhetorical. The habit of using the word ‘science’ to address a specific kind of knowledge is a modern practice, with ‘science’ having gradually taken over terms like ‘natural philosophy’ and ‘natural history.’ Thereby, the term ‘pseudoscience’ is also a recent one, with its meaning running alongside scientific endeavors of the nineteenth century. The article contributes to the debate aiming to pragmatically describe the function of pseudoscience in epistemology.en
dc.description.versionpublishersversion
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.extent29
dc.format.extent275996
dc.identifier.doi10.11590/abhps.2023.2.01
dc.identifier.issn2228-2009
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 82730867
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: ba7152f1-3328-41be-8c1c-e9f7c103b998
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85182660207
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/163187
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85182660207
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.bahps.org/acta-baltica/
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04666%2F2020/PT
dc.relationCHAM — Centre for the Humanities
dc.relationCHAM — Centre for the Humanities
dc.relationHistérias históricas - estudo epistemológico sobre os contextos de validade das definições científica
dc.subjectDemarcation problem
dc.subjectEpistemology
dc.subjectPhilosophy of science
dc.subjectPseudoscience
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.subjectHistory
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.titlePseudoscience Charges and the Demarcation Problemen
dc.typejournal article
degois.publication.firstPage3
degois.publication.issue2
degois.publication.lastPage31
degois.publication.titleActa Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum
degois.publication.volume11
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardNumberUIDB/04666/2020
oaire.awardNumberUIDP/04666/2020
oaire.awardNumberUI/BD/151195/2021
oaire.awardTitleCHAM — Centre for the Humanities
oaire.awardTitleCHAM — Centre for the Humanities
oaire.awardTitleHistérias históricas - estudo epistemológico sobre os contextos de validade das definições científica
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04666%2F2020/PT
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F04666%2F2020/PT
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/OE/UI%2FBD%2F151195%2F2021/PT
oaire.fundingStream6817 - DCRRNI ID
oaire.fundingStream6817 - DCRRNI ID
oaire.fundingStreamOE
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
rcaap.rightsopenAccess
relation.isProjectOfPublication5a4bf7c1-2d1e-4b8c-a636-75680f773764
relation.isProjectOfPublication1395c83d-c491-4fe3-9f54-a13739c3da0e
relation.isProjectOfPublication961d75f4-f892-487c-9c39-af0c442e77ad
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5a4bf7c1-2d1e-4b8c-a636-75680f773764

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
Pseudoscience_Charges_and_The_Demarcation_Problem.pdf
Tamanho:
269.53 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format