Hopf, Nancy B.Viegas, SusanaZare Jeddi, MaryamPasanen-Kase, RobertSantonen, TiinaSchmid, Kasparvan Nieuwenhuyse, AnGodderis, LodePersoons, RenaudNdaw, SophieDuca, Radu Corneliu2026-04-162026-04-162026-010160-4120PURE: 160609469PURE UUID: 52cfd7eb-ded9-481e-8018-8116e04d3550Scopus: 105028659387PubMed: 41496220WOS: 001661303500001http://hdl.handle.net/10362/202284Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s).This commentary addresses a critical and timely issue, namely the continued exclusion of certified occupational hygienists from conducting exposure assessments using the biomonitoring approach, as reflected in the recent EU-OSHA 2025 guidance. Current EU regulations frame biomonitoring within medical surveillance. This regulatory structure limits the use of biomonitoring as a preventive tool and sidelines professionals who are essential to exposure assessment and workplace safety. We are a multidisciplinary team comprising certified occupational hygienists and occupational medical doctors. We believe that the EU OSHA guidance represents a missed opportunity for collaboration. We hope this commentary will reach members of the EU regulatory bodies encouraging them to reconsider the current framing and promote a more integrated approach. By clarifying roles and fostering cooperation between occupational hygienists and physicians, we can ensure that biomonitoring fulfills its full potential in protecting worker health.378962engEU-OSHAExposure assessmentIndustrial ygienistOccupational biomonitoringOccupational hygienistRegulatoryGeneral Environmental ScienceSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingEnsuring coherence in occupational biomonitoringjournal article10.1016/j.envint.2025.110006a call for alignment and collaborationhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105028659387