Mendes, Mariana OliveiraRosa, Alexandra IsabelCarvalho, Andreia NevesNunes, Maria JoãoDionísio, PedroRodrigues, ElsaCosta, DanielaDuarte-Silva, SaraMaciel, PatríciaRodrigues, Cecília Maria PereiraGama, Maria JoãoCastro-Caldas, Margarida2022-02-032022-02-032021-071044-7431PURE: 32694017PURE UUID: 3b1f2d80-2b42-47e3-abd6-063b6df69ab0Scopus: 85105752069PubMed: 33994079WOS: 000671550400002ORCID: /0000-0002-4378-5173/work/159381321http://hdl.handle.net/10362/132212Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier Inc. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.The authors regret that in the original article there is an error in Fig. 5. Panel 5E incorrectly shows a blot for β-Actin that does not match the p-CREB blot shown above it. Nevertheless, this error does not affect the data presented in the original histogram, since quantifications of p-CREB and β-Actin were performed in the appropriate blots, corresponding to at least three independent experiments. Therefore, the histogram, image of the blot incubated with anti-p-CREB, and Figure legend are maintained. A corrected version of Fig. 5E is presented below. The authors state that this error does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. [Figure presented] The authors would also like to clarify the readers that since the same gel/ membrane was used to probe for different proteins, they all share the same β-Actin blot as a loading control. This is the case of Figs. 1B, 2B, 3B and 4D (long-term treatments), Figs. 2A and 3A (short term treatments), and Fig. 5A and D (BV2 cells), where the correspondent β-Actin was used as a loading control in the detection of different proteins expression levels. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.1701729engMolecular BiologyCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceCell Biologyother10.1016/j.mcn.2021.103626https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85105752069