Boukhelf, FouadSebaibi, NassimBoutouil, MohamedYoris-Nobile, Adrian I.Blanco-Fernandez, ElenaCastro-Fresno, DanielReal-Gutierrez, CarlosHerbert, Roger J. H.Greenhill, SamReis, BiancaFranco, João N.Borges, Maria TeresaSousa-Pinto, Isabelvan der Linden, PieterGómez, Oscar BabéMeyer, Hugo SainzAlmada, EmanuelStafford, RickDanet, ValentinLobo-Arteaga, JorgeTuaty-Guerra, MiriamE. Hall, Alice2023-03-212023-03-212022-07-302071-1050PURE: 56487528PURE UUID: 60c4047c-5d8b-4211-9611-d4f2d14cbd40Scopus: 85137219652WOS: 000838938300001http://hdl.handle.net/10362/151017Funding Information: Funding was provided by Interreg Atlantic area through the project EAPA_174/2016-3DPARE-Artificial Reef 3D Printing for Atlantic area granted to the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto; Bournemouth University; ESITC—École Supérieure d’Ingénieurs des Travaux de la Construction de Caen; University of Cantabria; and IPMA—Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera. Funding Information: The results presented in this article were obtained in the framework of the collaborative project Artificial Reef 3D Printing for Atlantic Area (3DPARE), co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the European cross-border program INTERREG Atlantic Area. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.This paper deals with the evolution monitoring of biomass colonization and mechanical properties of 3D printed eco-materials/mortars immersed in the sea. Measurements of tensile strength, compressive strength, and Young’s modulus were determined on samples deployed along the Atlantic coast of Europe, in France, United Kingdom, Spain, and Portugal. The samples were manufactured using 3D printing, where six mix designs with a low environmental impact binder were used. These mortars were based on geopolymer and cementitious binders (Cement CEM III), in which sand is replaced by three types of recycled sand, including glass, seashell, and limestone by 30%, 50%, and 100% respectively. The colonization of concrete samples by micro/macro-organisms and their durability were also evaluated after 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of immersion. The results showed that both biomass colonization and mechanical properties were better with CEM III compared to geopolymer-based compositions. Therefore, the mixed design optimized according to mechanical properties show that the use of CEM III should be preferred over these geopolymer binders in 3D printed concrete for artificial reef applications.148942079eng3D printingartificial reefscolonizationeco-materialgeopolymer bindermicro/macro-organismsComputer Science (miscellaneous)Geography, Planning and DevelopmentRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentBuilding and ConstructionEnvironmental Science (miscellaneous)Energy Engineering and Power TechnologyHardware and ArchitectureComputer Networks and CommunicationsManagement, Monitoring, Policy and LawSDG 7 - Affordable and Clean EnergySDG 13 - Climate ActionSDG 14 - Life Below Waterjournal article10.3390/su14159353https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85137219652