Smith, Emily R.Gomes, FilomenaBourassa, Megan W.Sudfeld, Christopher R.Gomes, Filomena2025-12-052025-12-052025-122161-8313PURE: 136245772PURE UUID: 980ca2c4-00fb-47c8-a04f-f884bcc1db07Scopus: 105022008915PubMed: 41218792http://hdl.handle.net/10362/191556Publisher Copyright: © 2025The authors regret an error in values listed the abstract, which should read “Observational analyses among participants who received MMS showed that ≥90% adherence was associated with increased birthweight (MD: 18 g; 95% CI: 3, 33 g) and lower risk of LBW [relative risk (RR): 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.98] and small-for-gestational age (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.92, 1.00), whereas <60% adherence was associated with greater risk of stillbirth (RR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.83) and maternal anemia (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.43) than 75%–90% adherence.” The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused.249349engFood ScienceMedicine (miscellaneous)Nutrition and Dieteticsother10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100553https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022008915