Pinto, Luiz FelipeHartz, Zulmira Maria de Araújo2025-03-172025-03-1720201413-8123PURE: 113040842PURE UUID: 909d2e8e-8ad0-48db-a12b-0d920f3fdd69Scopus: 85097421662WOS: 000596476300024PubMed: 33295510http://hdl.handle.net/10362/180781Publisher Copyright: © 2020, Associacao Brasileira de Pos - Graduacao em Saude Coletiva. All rights reserved.The term “basic care” is restricted to a few countries like Brazil. Since the 1978 Alma-Ata Conference, “primary health care” (PHC) has been used to designate care at the first level. The paper summarizes the experiences of evaluation in primary health care, based on the review of the set of manuscripts published by Journal Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. A bibliographic search was made in the SciELO database in the 1996-2020 period. Several descriptors were selected in the spectrum of evaluation and basic care/primary care. The reviewed studies suggest the existence of two analytical periods over the 25 years of the Journal. The first, characterized by the 1996-2010 studies, had the studies of structure/process/results by Donabedian as its predominant theory. The second, from 2011-2020, was Billings’ theories on Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSC) and Starfield’s PHC attributes. The main dimensions presented in the studies refer to evaluations with a quantitative approach and are induced by the policies and public consultations of the Ministry of Health, and instruments referenced by it.16220304engBrazilHealth assessmentPrimary health careHealth PolicyPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingjournal article10.1590/1413-812320202512.24882020https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85097421662