Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/59126
Título: CoFI - Consenso sobre fórmulas infantis
Outros títulos: CoFI - Consensus on infant formulasThe opinion of portuguese experts on their composition and indications
Autor: Rêgo, Carla
Pereira-da-Silva, Luís
Ferreira, Ricardo
Palavras-chave: Consensus
Delphi technique
Infant formula
Medicine(all)
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Data: 1-Dez-2018
Resumo: Introduction: Breastfeeding has unique health benefits. Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended during the first six months of life and should be maintained during complementary feeding. Alternatively, infant formulas, which are designed to mimic human breastmilk to promote similar metabolic and growth profiles, can be used. This study aimed to assess the opinion of Portuguese paediatricians with expertise in nutrition on the composition, benefits and indications of commercialised infant formulas. Material and Methods: A survey based on the Delphi method with application of a questionnaire developed by a scientific committee was issued to a panel of paediatricians with expertise in nutrition. An initial questionnaire that included 65 items covering 11 areas was administered in two rounds. Results: Twenty-one experts participated, and the final response rate was 87.5%. The panel was in agreement in 68.3% of the enquired items, namely that infant formulas should be used only when breastfeeding is not possible. Notwithstanding, the opinion of the panel was heterogeneous on a number of issues, particularly those related to the advantages and indications of ‘special’ or modified infant formulas (partially hydrolysed formulas and anti-colic, anti-constipation and anti-regurgitation formulas) and of young child formulas (‘growing-up formulas’). Discussion: A wide consensus was recorded on the nutritional quality, food safety and indications attributed to commercialized infant formulas. Conclusion: The opinion of Portuguese experts was consensual in most of the enquired topics. The absence of consensus was mostly related to issues that remain under debate in the literature and lack robust scientific evidence.
Peer review: yes
URI: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060174627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.10620
ISSN: 0870-399X
Aparece nas colecções:NMS - Artigos em revista nacional com arbitragem científica

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
10620_40853_3_PB.pdf429,29 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.